Essays academic service

An argument in favor of a law in ohio which prohibits teens to smoke tobacco

Should smoking be banned? Smoking should be completely banned in the UK, according to a top medical journal. The Lancet said tens of thousands of lives would be saved by making tobacco an illegal substance and possession of cigarettes a crime. An estimated 1,000 people a year in Britain died from inhaling second-hand tobacco smoke, its editorial claimed. Smokers group Forest said the article was a sign that "the health fascists are on the march.

How would it be enforced? Would a ban in public places be sufficient? Or do you think smokers are being treated unfairly? This debate is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below. The following comments reflect the balance of opinion we have received. I would imagine that banning smoking altogether would cause an illegal trade in tobacco similar to that of cannabis and other drugs.

Would this then mean more crime that can be attributed as a 'drug-related crime'? It would also make smoking seem to be 'cooler' to kids, who in their teenage years want to rebel.

  • No other addictive drugs are sold to children so why should tobacco be?
  • Sarah Mitchell, UK Banning smoking seems unfeasible and undesirable, but The Lancet has stimulated a good debate, hasn't it?
  • Advertising should be banned;
  • My message to them - go to blazes!
  • I am a smoker and I would wholeheartedly agree with such a move if it was in any way possible.

I think that maybe a ban in public places would be sufficient if anything is going to be put in place at all, as like most non-smokers, I don't want to be a passive smoker. Naseem Ramsahye, UK It's not a question of seeking to criminalise smokers. Rather smokers need to be civilised. Just because smoking isn't illegal, doesn't mean you can ruin our meals, stand next to us on the railway platform, throw your fag ends in the street, flick ash on our clothes, smell awful next to us in the lift etc.

If the threat of a complete ban can reduce the complete selfishness of so many smokers then bring it on!

Andrew, UK Banning smoking in public places is long overdue. This should be indeed practiced by all the nations of the world. Smokers would probably argue that they have every right and all the freedom to smoke to their heart's content. But it should be emphasized to them that their killer second-hand smoke inhibits the rights and freedom of people to live a healthy life.

Yes, lives could be saved but by banning smoking you are taking away people's free will to live their lives as they choose. If someone wants to smoke, drink, overeat, drive to fast, bungee jump off a bridge, sky dive without a parachute, an argument in favor of a law in ohio which prohibits teens to smoke tobacco their choice. All are dangerous, potentially life threatening activities. However, we do not need Big Brother to tell us how to live our lives.

Luke, UK Excessive legislation is becoming the new English disease Al, UK It doesn't surprise me that banning smoking is the next item on the prohibitive society's agenda.

If this lot have their way we will end up having less freedom than citizens of China or North Korea - both of which allow smoking including smoking in public places. I find it worrying that so many people's knee jerk reaction to anything they find disagreeable is to have a law against it - excessive legislation is becoming the new English disease. Sean, UK Why pick on smokers? Why not ban every form of recreation that has a record of fatalities?

I'm a non-smoker, but I'm trying to be realistic and fair about this issue. Chris Hunter, England I would love to see smoking banned in this country but I can't see it being enforced. Why don't we strike a happy medium and ban it in public places? Then those who want to slowly kill themselves can do so without affecting me.

I for one am not; I enjoy the benefits provided by a class of people who are happy to pay massive duties in order to shorten their lives. Bob, UK I never smoked until I was posted abroad on active service. Then, on pay days it was one pace forward, salute, pick up your money, pick up your 50 free cigs, salute, and one pace back.

And, I've smoked like a trooper since. I don't want to smoke and I've tried everything to stop, lotions, potions, pills, patches, gum, hypnotherapy and acupuncture, I've even tried willpower and that was as bad. If smoking is so bad for me, can I take the government to court for attempted murder? They gave me my fist one after all is said and done. Once the black market in cigarettes gets organised the price of a packet of twenty might even be cheaper than they are buying them legally.

Mike, UK I doubt they would because the government would lose a lot of revenue. Also if people want to smoke it's their choice, after all it's supposed to be a free country. I don't want my kids to see people smoking in my living room! Clive, UK Can't we concentrate on tackling real issues? Like poverty, racism and various other injustices? Can't we concentrate on tackling real issues? Lizzie, Scotland What a wonderful way to create a new criminal underclass. Before heroin was made illegal there were around 500 registered heroin addicts in the country.

You can see the difference prohibition made there with today's figures! It makes me wonder whether or not the people making statements about banning it have been indulging in some substance abuse themselves.

  • Jan, UK A ban would not work and is insulting to human rights;
  • Let's leave it to individuals to make their own choice;
  • But for Dr Glover, the risk analysis is clear — she likens it to people in a burning building, blocked from the exit by health professionals because they're not sure if the stairs are safe.

Mark, UK A total ban in public places, workplaces, etc. I am aware that this is impractical and I can't force my views on others but I think a LOT could still be done in that direction.

A total ban in public places, workplaces, etc. Advertising should be banned. Cigarettes should be sold only to over 18s with ID cards, and retailers should be imprisoned for not complying with this.

Excise duties should be raised so cigarettes cost at least three times their 1948 level in real terms and raised at least once every three months to stay that way.

  • Anyone out there to lobby for more legroom in airplanes?
  • I do not advocate a ban, for the reasons first stated, but reserve the right to ridicule and insult smokers without mercy, in return!
  • Smoking should be completely banned in the UK, according to a top medical journal;
  • Obese people being treated as second class citizens?
  • What if it's 40 per cent?

Lesley, Scotland It is impossible to justify having tobacco legal while other similar drugs, such as cannabis are illegal. Either legalise both or ban both. This schizophrenic approach is not sensible. David Patrick, UK So we should ban tobacco? Our law enforcement agencies can't cope with current illegal drugs so how would they cope with banning tobacco? The criminal world would soon fill the gap left by such a ban, who would fill the taxation gap? What should we ban next, alcohol, cars, dangerous sports, fast food?

In light of that fags don't seem too bad. Roger, England As far as I'm concerned everyone should have at least one vice Kirstie, Spain As far as I'm concerned everyone should have at least one vice - be it chocolate, alcohol or cigarettes. I am a smoker, I have the odd drink too and I indulge in chocolate once in a while.

I am not overweight, I am very rarely ill, and don't cost the NHS a penny. Banning smoking is not the way to go - I chose to smoke as others would chose to eat what most health professionals would consider to be an unhealthy, fatty diet with no veggies, fruit or fibre.

An argument in favor of a law in ohio which prohibits teens to smoke tobacco

I wouldn't dare preach to them about their lifestyle - and no one will preach to me. Kirstie, Spain Legalise the use of cannabis and then ban smoking! Aren't we doing something wrong here? As an ex-smoker I would support a ban in public places, especially restaurants. Pubs and bars should be fitted with effective air conditioning which should be made mandatory. John Norris, London Cannabis is illegal and it doesn't stop hundreds of thousands of us smoking it.

How will banning smoking tobacco work? Jonny Blunt, UK Don't ban it. Put another 10 quid tax on each packet and make the smelly, inconsiderate, addicts pay for the privilege of affecting our health as well as theirs.

Carl Beardshall, England Of course it should be banned, just look how well the prohibition of drugs works, they're illegal and you never hear of anyone taking drugs. Oh wait a minute. Matt, UK The rest of us can sleep easy in our cotton wool cots safe in the knowledge that we will live forever Wyn Evans, UK I totally support the Lancet in its drive to rid society of any form of activity that would remotely encourage civil liberty and would in addition to banning tobacco also seek to ban anything else that Nanny thinks inappropriate.

The death penalty could be invoked for persistent rule breakers and the rest of us can sleep easy in our cotton wool cots safe in the knowledge that we will live forever.

Wyn Evans, UK As anti smoker I am totally against anybody's right to smoke in private being made illegal. Ban it in public places by all means, but not in private. What a stupid idiotic no brain idea. Paul Talor, UK Ban the sale of cigarettes. Not the smoking of them. Tax people who sell cigarettes all their assets.

E-cigarettes: Is Australia out of step with other countries?

Then make them clean the streets of dropped dog ends Matthew, UK In the UK road accidents kill over 3,000 people every year and cause nearly 300,000 casualties. Why not outlaw cars and impose vehicles pulled by donkeys or mules instead? The fundamentalism underlining such statements is really frightening and the anti-tobacco lobby is becoming more and more hysterical.

I can think of far better causes to support. Anyone out there to lobby for more legroom in airplanes? Or for more frequent renewal of the air in the cabin during long flights?

Or don't anti-tobacco fundamentalists know that since smoking on board has been forbidden, the air renewal in the cabin has greatly decreased, thus increasing far more the risk of respiratory infections? Anna Smith, South Africa What people choose to get up to in their own home is up to them.