Essays academic service


An overview of the symptoms and treatment of post traumatic stress disorder

However, randomized controlled trials RCTs and meta-analyses have reported mixed results. The primary outcome was based on PTSD scores continuous variable.

  • Likewise, in the study by Cohen et al;
  • For the main outcome PTSD scores we initially calculated the standardized mean difference and the pooled SD of each comparison;
  • The site intends to provide continually updated cutting-edge knowledge, experience and lessons learned for those working in the field of transforming violent ethnopolitical conflict;
  • Is PTSD always to be seen as a disease?
  • Department of Veterans Affairs;
  • Eligibility criteria We adopted the following inclusion criteria:

The main outcome was Hedges' g. We used a random-effects model using the statistical packages for meta-analysis available in Stata 13 for Mac OSX. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot. Meta-regression was performed using the random-effects model. The funnel plot shows that studies were evenly distributed, with just one study located marginally at the edge of the funnel and one study located out of the funnel. We found that exclusion of either study did not have a significant impact on the results.

Meta-regression found no particular influence of any variable on the results. O desfecho principal foi o g de Hedges.

It is estimated that 7.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Although medications and psychotherapy have been shown to help reduce symptoms and treat comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms, in one third of patients there is no improvement in symptoms.

Several different protocols have emerged focusing on the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex DLPFC. It is relevant to point out that a previous meta-analysis has already been published. Literature review We reviewed the following references and databases: Boolean terms were used as follows: We searched for work published up to September 30, 2015. Eligibility criteria We adopted the following inclusion criteria: We excluded case reports and case series, uncontrolled trials and trials assessing conditions other than PTSD or interventions other than TMS.

Data extraction The following variables were extracted according to a structured checklist developed by the authors in advance: Although categorical variables might be more readily interpretable than continuous ones despite the fact that the odds ratio is often misinterpreted as a risk ratioour choice was based on the fact that the primary outcome of all studies included was based on continuous variables and so we considered that a continuous effect size would better synthesize the studies chosen for review.

For continuous outcomes, the meta-analysis was performed on endpoint PTSD scores. Since studies used more than one PTSD scale, we extracted data corresponding to the study's definitions of the primary outcome.

  1. Eligibility criteria We adopted the following inclusion criteria. We therefore compared high frequency right DLPFC stimulation with sham stimulation in one analysis and in another analysis we compared low frequency right DLPFC stimulation with sham stimulation.
  2. Which impact do sociopolitical and medical aspects have on setting a diagnosis?
  3. This procedure is convenient when handling different scales such as PTSD scales since it standardizes the effect sizes across all studies based on the SD of each study.

When a study reported scores at more than one time-point, we used the scores corresponding to the longest time period prior to unblinding. For studies in which three groups were compared, two separate datasets were compared in each of two different analyses.

For example, in the study by Boggio et al. Likewise, in the study by Cohen et al. We therefore compared high frequency right DLPFC stimulation with sham stimulation in one analysis and in another analysis we compared low frequency right DLPFC stimulation with sham stimulation. The study by Isserles et al. The groups were configured as follows: Even though all groups received some kind of treatment, we considered group c to be the sham group since TMS was not applied.

  • Department of Veterans Affairs;
  • Quantitative analysis Main outcomes All analyses were performed using the statistical packages for meta-analysis available in Stata 13 for Mac OSX;
  • O desfecho principal foi o g de Hedges;
  • Highlights social aspects, the validity of the diagnosis, causes, effects as well as biochemical and anatomical findings;
  • Based on the extant evidence, nightmares appear to be particularly relevant to posttraumatic stress disorder, and may even be implicated in its pathophysiology;
  • Quality assessment We assessed the methodological quality of each trial by assessing the following:

In a crossover study conducted by Osuch et al. Quality assessment We assessed the methodological quality of each trial by assessing the following: Quantitative analysis Main outcomes All analyses were performed using the statistical packages for meta-analysis available in Stata 13 for Mac OSX. For the main outcome PTSD scores we initially calculated the standardized mean difference and the pooled SD of each comparison.

This procedure is convenient when handling different scales such as PTSD scales since it standardizes the effect sizes across all studies based on the SD of each study. For the study by Boggio et al.

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder / PTSD

For the study by Osuch et al. Hedges' g was used as the measure of effect size, which is appropriate for studies with small sample sizes. The pooled effect size was weighted by the inverse variance method and measured using the random-effects model.

Studies that failed to provide crucial data such as SD or scale assessment were excluded from the final analysis.

How is PTSD measured - Assessments

Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot, which displays confidence interval boundaries to assist in visualizing whether the studies are within the funnel, thus providing an estimate of publication bias e. A sensitivity analysis was also performed, assessing the impact of each study on the overall results by excluding one study at a time.

Results Overview Our systematic review yielded 54 studies after duplicates were removed.

  • Eligibility criteria We adopted the following inclusion criteria;
  • The primary outcome was based on PTSD scores continuous variable;
  • Highlights social aspects, the validity of the diagnosis, causes, effects as well as biochemical and anatomical findings.

Of these, 49 articles did not meet the eligibility criteria. Mean age was 51. No washout of drugs was performed. Demographics and stimulation protocols are summarized in Table 1.