Essays academic service

Two men that made a big difference on the subject of human rights

February 11, 2014 Debating Human Rights — universal or relative to culture? For more cartoons see http: Its 30 different articles outline the political, economic, social rights that we are all entitled to — no matter who we are — because we are born human.

Services on Demand

By such reckoning, the universality of human rights is beyond question. Created in the aftermath of the Second World War and the horrors of the holocaust, the declaration was an attempt to ensure that such a catastrophe could never ever take place again.

The humanity of all peoples was to be acknowledged beyond recognition by all states, with no exceptions. They argue that by claiming human rights are universal, we ignore and undermine the cultural differences that exist between societies in different parts of the world.

How can one single document claim to represent every single person in the world, when our experiences are so different?

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Our view of the world and our role in it is shaped by the society in which we live; and therefore our moral standards, the values which we emphasise as individuals, depend on our cultural upbringing.

As a result, how can the UDHR possible have the same meaning for everyone in the world? For critics, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a Western-biased document which fails to account for the cultural norms and values which exist in the rest of the world.

More than that, it is an attempt to impose Western values on everybody else. Anyone reading the document will note the emphasis on individual rights as opposed to communal rights which tend to be more heavily emphasised in the non-Western world.

Three generations of human rights

But are their arguments misguided? Plus, two-thirds of the endorsing votes came from non-Western countries 48 in favour, none against and 8 abstentions. Nevertheless, some still argue that the declaration represents a neo-colonialist attempt by the West to control the lives of those in the developing world.

Such arguments have been used by authoritarian leaders and states to violate human rights particularly those of women and children under the guise of enforcing tradition.

For example, Saudi Arabia abstained from the vote on the declaration, arguing that Articles 16 and 18 the rights for men and women to marry who they choose, and the right to freedom of religion were in opposition to Islamic faith and teachings which emphasise patriarchal authority.

Debating Human Rights – universal or relative to culture?

The UDHR is certainly not perfect, and yes, it can be argued that the document emphasises individualism over community rights. But does this really mean that human rights are not universal? In their eagerness to promote the importance of cultural diversity and group rights, critics forget that all cultures are composed of individuals and regardless of our cultural upbringing; no two people think exactly the same.

Group rights are great in theory, but they can be used to suppress individuals who do not fit the hegemony of that group. By protecting individuals, human rights do not diminish the group, but merely ensure the protection of each and every individual within it.

And in addition, culture is not static, but constantly evolving as people come into contact with new ideas and concepts.

100 People who changed the world

Because some cultures do not emphasis certain rights at the moment, does not mean that will always be the case. In any case, human rights are compatible with cultural diversity. The language of human rights is the only universally available moral vernacular that validates the claims of women and children against the oppression they experience in patriarchal and tribal societies; it is the only vernacular that enables dependent persons to perceive themselves a and as moral agents and to act against practices- arranged marriages, purdah, civic disenfranchisement, genital mutilation, domestic slavery, and so on-that are ratified by the weight and authority of their cultures.

These agents seek out human rights protection precisely because it legitimizes their protests against oppression. The declaration might not be perfect, and certainly there are issues regarding the enforcement of such rights.

What matters is the purpose of human rights — not their origins — and their ability to protect the individual interests of the powerless, in all cultures. The attack on human rights. See our introductory guide to human rights for community and youth educators.