Essays academic service

A study of the i ii and iii chapters of the book of john

Bible Study on John 2: Cana is only mentioned in John 2: In the Gospel of John, Jesus' mother is never mentioned by name but she is mentioned John 2: The word "disciples" in the Gospel of John is used more broadly than it is in the book of Matthew where it refers only to the 12. Here, it means those were following Christ as disciples and can be more than just 12.

Either way, they were out. At a wedding, for the wine to run out could be a great embarrassment to the bride and groom and their families. My hour has not yet come. Later during the crucifixion Jesus addressed his mother Mary and said "woman, behold, your son" John 19: Literally in the Greek, Jesus said "what to me and to you? Have You come to destroy us? I know who You are - the Holy One of God!

I implore You by God, do not torment me! But for this purpose I came to this hour. It was also due to his teachings Miracles: Most probably the servants belonged to the household where the wedding was being held.

Roman Catholics often use this verse, and its context, to exalt Mary and support her influence over Jesus. After all, Mary gave instructions and the servants followed. Furthermore, Jesus also performed his first miracle at the behest of Mary.

Therefore, many Catholics are urged to pray to Mary in order to have influence with Jesus. The statement of Mary implies that Mary knew something about Jesus more than is revealed in the text. Perhaps she had studied the Scriptures, knew he was the Messiah, and knew he could perform miracles.

Biblical Studies/New Testament Commentaries/The Gospel of John/Chapter 2

If she acknowledged that his ministry began after his baptism by John the Baptist, then it is probable that she understood more than the average person, even the disciples, at that time. Because Mary was involved, it is possible that she may have been related to one of the families in the wedding. Now there were six stone waterpots set there for the Jewish custom of purification, containing twenty or thirty gallons each.

The six water pots may or may not relate to the six days of creation Genesis 1: After all, this is Jesus' first miracle, and it is to create. But Clay water parts would have to be broken. Literally, the Greek says "measures", not gallons. A measure was roughly equivalent to 9 or 10 gallons, or 80 to 120 liters. Jesus told the servants to fill the water pots with water.

  • In those days, wine was the only drink other than water;
  • I know who You are - the Holy One of God!

Apparently they were already empty. As soon as they had fill the water pots Jesus told them to take some out and it had been changed the wine.

The head waiter is probably a servant in charge of the wine. When the headwaiter tasted the water which had become wine, and did not know where it came from but the servants who had drawn the water knewthe headwaiter called the bridegroom, The text does not indicate if all six of the water parts had turned to wine or if just one of them had been changed. This is problematic since a wedding feast would require alcoholic wine and grape juice.

Weddings required a lot of preparation and any water that would have to be stored could go stagnant. Therefore, wine would have been used since it would remain fresh for much longer periods. Plus, wine was used in celebrations, not grape juice. So, most probably by the time the wine ran out, people were inebriated to some degree. Keep the good wine until later. The general practice at such feasts was to give the good wine right away because that's when a person's palate was most sensitive. After the period of consumption, the pallet was not as able to discern tastes and so the lesser quality wine would be presented.

This is the first miracle of Jesus. Therefore, this first manifestation of his glory is a demonstration of his creative ability. His miracle moved his disciples to believe in him. After this He went down to Capernaum, He and His mother and His brothers and His disciples; and they stayed there a few days Apparently after the wedding feast the went to Capernaum. Cana is in the hill country but Capernaum is below sea level on the shore of Galilee.

His brothers would have been younger brothers, in spite a study of the i ii and iii chapters of the book of john what the Roman Catholic Church says about the perpetual virginity of Mary. Therefore, in order for them to hold their position, they render the Greek adelphoi "brothers" as anepsios "cousins". But the Greek is adelphoi, brothers, not anepsios, cousins. The account of Jesus cleansing the temple is recorded in all four Gospels: In the synoptic Gospels Matthew, Mark, Luke the cleansing of the temple is placed in the last week of Jesus' ministry.

Here in the gospel of John it occurs at the beginning of his ministry. Some commentators think that it is possible Jesus cleanser temple two times, once at the beginning and once at the end of his ministry. This would make sense if we consider that by two witnesses is a truth established. Another option is that there was only one cleansing of the temple and John, a different gospel in style and purpose than the Synoptics, place it at the beginning of his ministry for theological reasons.

In verses 21-22, John records the incident where Jesus prophesies his own resurrection and John comments that Jesus was referring to the temple of his body.

Bible Study on Gospel of John, Chapter 2

But it was not a festival in the sense sometimes used in modern times which speaks of celebration. The Passover festival, in ancient times, was a time of remembrance where God passed over the people of Israel when the angel of death was sent to the firstborn of Egypt. And He found in the temple those who were selling oxen and sheep and doves, and the money changers seated at their tables.

  • In this chapter John as a disciple three times gives us a disciple's point of view as to Christ'smiracles; here, and at John 2;
  • His miracles were secondary manifestations, buthis Passion was the supreme manifestation John 8;
  • On this occasion Jesus objected to the use of the templefor trade without criticizing the nature of the trade;
  • The placement of the account of the temple incident at this early point in Jesus' ministry, as a historical issue of the relationship between John and the Synoptics;
  • What clues are there?
  • It means a trust in him.

The money changers changed the Roman coins into Jewish coins for temple use, because no coins could be allowed on the inner Temple grounds that bore the images of Roman leaders. Instead, it was more like a long cord or rope used to drive cattle. The Jews did not allow weapons of any kind on the temple grounds, which would explain why Jesus had to improvise. Did Jesus take the coins and scatter them and then turn the tables over, or did turning the tables over because they scattering of the coins?

In Greek, "house" and "place" are the same word: Jesus claimed a special relationship with God.

  • Jesus called this supreme sign his "hour" John 12;
  • Furthermore, Jesus also performed his first miracle at the behest of Mary;
  • This chapter itself gives usa faithful picture of "what was in man";
  • Jesus replies in verse 4 by saying "My time has not yet come;
  • Whoever does what is good is of God; whoever does what is evil has never seen God.

The phrases that occur in the gospel of Mark. The phrase designates Christ's authority from God the Father and hence the Trinity. But they had turned it into a place of monetary gain. So they asked him for a physical manifestation some sort of sign that demonstrated his authority. Remember, Jesus is in the temple area, the singular most important spiritual place in all of Israel.

His actions are, therefore, very serious. Only God would have the right to cleanse the temple. Notice the juxtaposition of destroy and raise up. It means to loose, set free, sever, break, demolish, destroy. It has different senses in different verses. Technically speaking, the temple was not completed until A. Some critics have used this to undermine the inspiration scripture by citing it as an error.

But, this is not an error for two reasons. John is quoting what the Pharisees said. And, quoting an error does not mean the Bible is in error. More likely the answer is that the Jews obviously knew that the temple was not yet completed and would therefore have been referring to the summary of the whole process of the temple being built up to that time.

This is the commentary of John the apostle. He understood that Jesus was talking about his death and resurrection, because he wrote the gospel after Christ had ascended into heaven - as is demonstrated in the next verse. Jesus body was truly the temple of God. Notice the changing of the voice from active to passive. From "I will raise" in v. This is consistent with the doctrine of the Trinity.

John 2 Bible Study

The father raised Jesus 1 Thess. Many people were trusting in Jesus. This is more than mere mental acknowledgment. It means a trust in him. This is not uncommon in the Greek language. This is an affirmation that he is God in flesh. A Handbook on the Gospel of John. United Bible Societies, 1993.