Essays academic service


Compare and contrast martin luther king jr and gandhi

Who can edit:

At this point, it is worth mentioning the fact that their life and work contributed to a considerable change in the life of their peoples. They led their countries to almost revolutionary changes and to change of the ideology of the ruling elite. On comparing Gandhi and King were true leaders.

Martin Luther King Jr. His work contributed to the rise of the Civil Rights movement. Similarly, Gandhi headed the struggle of Indian people for a better life. He headed the struggle of democratic forces oriented on the protection of interests of average people in India against the ruling party Corbridge and Harris, 109.

Mohandas Gandhi vs. Martin Luther King Jr.

At the same time, both Gandhi and King supported the non-violent method. In this respect, it is worth mentioning the fact that Gandhi was a prominent supporter of the non-violent method of struggle. He argued that the civil action is strong enough to force the ruling elite to change their policies or to give in their power to a new political force headed by Gandhi.

Similarly, Martin Luther King Jr. Instead, he stimulated the rise of the Civil Rights movement.

Downloading prezi...

In such a way, Martin Luther King focused on the development of the Civil Rights movement and stimulated the development of non-violent methods, the rise of protests and other non-violent methods. However, in spite of obvious similarities, Martin Luther King Jr. To put it more precisely, Martin Luther King struggled a lot because he had to ruin racial biases and stereotypes and change the entire society making Americans one nation Douglass, 76.

  1. He argued that the civil action is strong enough to force the ruling elite to change their policies or to give in their power to a new political force headed by Gandhi. To put it more precisely, Martin Luther King struggled a lot because he had to ruin racial biases and stereotypes and change the entire society making Americans one nation Douglass, 76.
  2. In such a way, Martin Luther King focused on the development of the Civil Rights movement and stimulated the development of non-violent methods, the rise of protests and other non-violent methods. He just showed the way his nation should pass to reach the unity and prosperity and to overthrow the ruling elite, which oppressed the population of India Bondurant, 52.
  3. He argued that the civil action is strong enough to force the ruling elite to change their policies or to give in their power to a new political force headed by Gandhi. The support at the national level contributed to the development of the strong political power headed by Gandhi Ashman, 104.
  4. However, in spite of obvious similarities, Martin Luther King Jr. International Socialism, December 1997, 77.
  5. The Martin Luther King Conspiracy.

At this point, it is worth mentioning the fact that Martin Luther King Jr. In contrast, Gandhi struggled against the ruling party solely, whereas the entire nation supported him.

He just showed the way his nation should pass to reach the unity and prosperity and to overthrow the ruling elite, which oppressed the population of India Bondurant, 52. In such a way, Gandhi had the abundant support of the entire nation. The support at the national level contributed to the development of the strong political power headed by Gandhi Ashman, 104. He did not need to unite large masses of people like Martin Luther King.

In such a way, he relied on the support of the entire nation, whereas Martin Luther King Jr. Thus, taking into account all above mentioned, it is important to place emphasis on the fact that Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.

COMPARE & CONTRAST: DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR & MAHATMA GANDHI

International Socialism, December 1997, 77. Black Lives, White Lives. The Gandhian Philosophy of Conflict. The Martin Luther King Conspiracy: Probe Magazine, 18, 2000.