Essays academic service


An overview of the aspects of kantian philosophy

Practically speaking, the term Kantianism refers to the thought of Kant and those immediate followers who remained within the general framework of his system.

The renewal of Kantianism towards the end of the nineteenth century is usually referred to as Neo-Kantianism. The general epistemological position of Kantianism is that knowledge comes about through a synthesis performed by the subject. In ethicsKantianism is synonymous with the deontological position expressed by the notion of the categorical imperative. The term Kantianism, or Kantian, is still often used to describe contemporary positions in philosophy of mindepistemology, and ethics.

At the same time, in England the movement of British Empiricism, culminating with the philosophy of David Humehad moved into the exactly opposite direction, that of skepticism towards any claim to knowledge about ultimate things, and an approach to knowledge based almost entirely on experience.

Cause and effect, in that view, was not an absolute law but a simple habit of thinking based on repeated observation. At a time when science was experiencing great progress based on the Newtonian revolution, a double question was thus raised: First, was the validity of scientific conclusion unquestionable, or was the scientific method a mere approximation for practical purposes? Even more importantly, was it possible to reach certain knowledge about transcending reality and ultimate things, given the contradictory claims of existing metaphysical systems, and in spite of the challenge of skepticism?

In his first major work, the groundbreaking Critique of Pure Reason 1781; 1787Kant would make the distinction between phenomena and noumenathe former referring to the unknowable nature of an overview of the aspects of kantian philosophy and the latter to the way they appear to observers through the mediums of space and time the forms of human intuition and the categories of our mind, such as causalityidentity, and substance.

In other words, for Kant, observers only know things as they appear to them in space-time and the way the mind synthesizes them as concepts according to basic rules of thinking the categories. These rules are the way people automatically think, thus they are a priori, that is, independent from experience.

However, there is no guarantee whatsoever that intuition and thinking correspond to an objective reality.

  • Kant and Political Philosophy;
  • It changed everything in philosophy;
  • Oxford University Press, 1958;
  • Schulze, Salomon Maimon, and Jakob S;
  • He believed that traditional metaphysics attempts to describe objects that are completely beyond the scope of the senses;
  • More important, however, are Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi 1749-1832 and especially Moses Mendelssohn 1729-1786 , both of whom closely interacted with Kant, often critically but with respect, while maintaining their own perspectives.

Entities that do not correspond to phenomena in space-time, so-called transcendent notions, including that of God, cannot be the object of any theoretical knowledge.

For Kant, seeking to know them theoretically can only result in empty speculation. On the other hand, scientific knowledge arrived at by the proper use of the categories of the mind based on intuition in time and space yields to reliable knowledge, but only in terms of phenomenal knowledge about the world as it appears to humans.

Philosophy

Yet, there is an explanation as to why people seek to apply categories beyond experience, namely, why metaphysics is a natural human disposition. Because of the very nature of human reason, which seeks to totally unify all reality into a systematic whole, thus resulting in notions such as "God" and "the eternal soul.

In his own words, reason had to make place for faith. It changed everything in philosophy. Only very few thinkers and schools of thought such as the much later Neo-Thomism would seriously challenge the new starting point created by Kant.

Kant spent the remaining part of his life addressing these questions to arrive at a comprehensive view of life, but he did not succeed in providing responses that would satisfy his various followers.

Only centuries later did a reaction against Aristotle and other philosophies lead to a renewal of Platonic thought, Neo-Platonism in its different forms.

In the case of Kant, with the acceleration of history, it took only decades before there was a reaction to the intervening systems German Idealism and Positivism and the emergence of various types of Neo-Kantianism. A brief overview The period of early Kantianism comprises the period stretching roughly from the last decade of the eighteenth century, when Kant had completed his main works, to 1830 Hegel passed away in 1831.

Overview of Kant's Philosophy

They include FichteSchellingand Hegel. Later, Schopenhauer would propose his own system in contradiction to the German Idealists, claiming to be the rightful heir to Kant. They include Karl L. Schulze, Salomon Maimon, and Jakob S. More important, however, are Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi 1749-1832 and especially Moses Mendelssohn 1729-1786both of whom closely interacted with Kant, often critically but with respect, while maintaining their own perspectives.

A discussion on later Kantian schools can be found in the article on Neo-Kantianism. Pure theoretical reason The first Critique Critique of pure reason has a clear epistemological starting point. What is the ultimate nature of things? This is the question that had plagued Kant all along, as it had his predecessors.

After concluding that theoretical knowledge on this level was impossible against his hopesKant went on to seek how this realm of ultimate reality could be grasped otherwise. Much of the early criticism leveled against Kant pertains to the perceived inconsistencies of the main items of his philosophy: Jacobi was the first to note that Kant appeared to consider the noumenon as the cause of phenomena, while at the same time considering causality as a category pertaining to the phenomenal world, thus making a cause and effect relationship between noumena and phenomena inapplicable.

In his last, unpublished work, the Opus Postumum, Kant seems to have moved towards the idealist position. For him, the ideas of God, freedom, and immortality, though not within the realm of theoretical reason, can and should be affirmed in virtue of practical reason. This led to the so-called moral proof for the existence of God: The ideas of justice and goodness entitle people to assume the existence of God, and no logical reason opposes the assumption, hence it is legitimate to make it.

All actions are performed in accordance with some underlying maxim or principle, and it is this that the an overview of the aspects of kantian philosophy worth of an action is judged according to.

  • Indiana University Press, 2006;
  • After concluding that theoretical knowledge on this level was impossible against his hopes , Kant went on to seek how this realm of ultimate reality could be grasped otherwise;
  • He believed that he brought to philosophy a new method, which he called criticism;
  • More important, however, are Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi 1749-1832 and especially Moses Mendelssohn 1729-1786 , both of whom closely interacted with Kant, often critically but with respect, while maintaining their own perspectives.

Kant's ethics are founded on his view of rationality as the ultimate good and his belief that all people are fundamentally rational beings. The categorical imperative, however, was saluted by some as the philosophical expression of human conscience.

The notion of absolute duty without a specific content has even been said to have negatively affected the psyche of the German people.

Kantianism

Aesthetics and teleology In his third Critique, the Critique of Judgment, Kant intended to create a bridge between theoretical reason and practical reason by means of reflective judgment. Kant compares aesthetic judgment an overview of the aspects of kantian philosophy the teleological judgment based on the apparent harmony within nature. The harmonious beauty of the universe seems to imply the presence of a Designer, just as the beauty of an artwork does. For Fries, the capacity to appreciate beauty was a sign of moral excellence and thus related to the capacity to perceive the divine.

Compared to regular beauty, the sublime elicits a feeling of awe in addition to aesthetic appreciation. The Kantian Foundations of Modern Theology 1994. Kant's positions in teleology were neglected by scientists for many years because in their minds they were associated with vitalist views of evolution. Their gradual rehabilitation recently is evident in teleonomy which bears a number of features, such as the description of organisms, that are reminiscent of the Kantian conception of final causes as essentially recursive in nature.

For decades, Kant has been accused of being a purely rationalist deist opposed to all forms of established religion and devoid of any genuinely religious sense or interest. It has repeatedly been said that, for Kant, religion merely amounted to ethics. In his only major work on religion, Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone 1793written towards the end of his life, Kant offers an explicit appreciation of the role religion should play in human society.

Kant also stresses that the unexplainable presence of evil in the human soula presence that makes it impossible to respond to the commands of the moral imperative also present in our soul, makes it reasonable to expect supernatural help. By giving the word reason a sense that goes beyond the ordinary sense of mere logical reasoning, Kant offers an alternative to thinkers that emphasize the role of the irrational as a counterpart to reason, with the result of creating a dichotomy between the two.

  1. Ethics, on the contrary, treats the practical use of reason as if it were concerned only with sensible objects, most importantly with their relation to pleasure and pain. It further reveals that reason dictates to itself the moral law.
  2. At the same time, in England the movement of British Empiricism, culminating with the philosophy of David Hume , had moved into the exactly opposite direction, that of skepticism towards any claim to knowledge about ultimate things, and an approach to knowledge based almost entirely on experience.
  3. In the case of Kant, with the acceleration of history, it took only decades before there was a reaction to the intervening systems German Idealism and Positivism and the emergence of various types of Neo-Kantianism. Overview of Kant's Philosophy Immanuel Kant 1724-1804 singlehandly set the stage for German philosophy in the nineteenth century.

Similarly, Fries would state that faith as the understanding of the divine represents the highest function of reason.

In political philosophy Kant has had wide and increasing influence with the major political philosopher of the late twentieth century, John Rawls drawing heavily on his inspiration in setting out the basis for a liberal view of political institutions. The nature of Rawls' use of Kant has engendered serious controversy but has demonstrated the vitality of Kantian considerations across a wider range of questions than was once thought plausible. Kant and the Ends of Aesthetics.

From Critique to Doctrine. Beiner, Ronald, and William James Booth eds. Kant and Political Philosophy. Yale University Press, 1993. A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason. Religion As a Province of Meaning: The Kantian Foundations of Modern Theology. Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 1994. Kant's Treatment of Causality. Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion.

Indiana University Press, 2006. Knowledge, Belief, and Aesthetic Sense. Holzhey, Helmut, and Vilem Mudroch. Historical Dictionary of Kant and Kantianism. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: The Idea of the Holy. Oxford University Press, 1958. Rawls, John and Barbara Herman. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Harvard University Press, 2000. The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2000. The Kantianism of Hegel and Nietzsche: Renovation in 19th-century German Philosophy.

Edwin Mellen Press, 2005.