Essays academic service


Lewin k 1947 frontiers in group dynamics human relations 1 1 5

KolbEric TristBrian J. Mistler Kurt Lewin September 9, 1890 — February 12, 1947 was a German - American psychologistknown as one of the lewin k 1947 frontiers in group dynamics human relations 1 1 5 pioneers of socialorganizationaland applied psychology in the United States. In this new life, Lewin defined himself and his contributions within three lenses of analysis; applied research, action research, and group communication were his major offerings to the field of communication.

A Review of General Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Lewin as the 18th most cited psychologist of the 20th century. It was a small village of about 5,000 people, about 150 of which were Jewish.

His father owned a small general store, and the family lived in an apartment above the store. His father, Leopold, owned a farm jointly with his brother Max; however, the farm was legally owned by a Christian because Jews were unable to own farms at the time. He became involved with the socialist movement and women's rights around this time. By the Easter semester of 1911, his interests had shifted toward philosophy. By the summer of 1911, the majority of his courses were in psychology.

Due to a war wound, he returned to the University of Berlin to complete his Ph. Lewin had written a dissertation proposal asking Stumpf to be his supervisor, which Stumpf had accepted. Even though Lewin worked under Stumpf to complete his dissertation, the relationship between them did not involve much communication. Lewin studied associations, will, and intention for his dissertation, but he did not discuss it with Stumpf until his final doctoral examination.

In 1919, the couple welcomed their daughter Esther Agnes, and in 1922, their son Fritz Reuven was born. They divorced around 1927, and Maria immigrated to Israel with the children.

In 1929, Lewin married Gertrud Weiss. Their daughter Miriam was born in 1931, and their son Daniel was born in 1933. He also joined the Psychological Institute of the University of Berlin where he lectured and gave seminars on both philosophy and psychology.

But when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933 the Institute members had to disband, moving to England and then to America. Trist was impressed with his theories and went on to use them in his studies on soldiers during the Second World War. Lewin immigrated to the United States in August 1933 and became a naturalized citizen in 1940.

A few years after moving to America, Lewin began asking people to pronounce his name as "Lou-in" rather than "Le-veen" because the misspelling of his name by Americans had led to many missed phone calls. While working at MIT in 1946, Lewin received a phone call from the Director of the Connecticut State Inter Racial Commission [7] requesting help to find an effective way to combat religious and racial prejudices.

He set up a workshop to conduct a 'change' experiment, which laid the foundations for what is now known as sensitivity training.

Carl Rogers believed that sensitivity training is "perhaps the most significant social invention of this century. Jacob Fine at Harvard Medical School.

Lewin taught for a time at Duke University. He was buried in his home town. His wife died in 1987. Work Lewin coined the notion of genidentity[10] which has gained some importance in various theories of space-time and related fields.

Frontiers in Group Dynamics

He also proposed Herbert Blumer 's interactionist perspective of 1937 as an alternative to the nature versus nurture debate. Lewin suggested that neither nature inborn tendencies nor nurture how experiences in life shape individuals alone can account for individuals' behavior and personalities, but rather that both nature and nurture interact to shape each person. First, and foremost, Kurt Lewin was an applied researcher and practical theorist. Most scholars of the time reveled in the fear that devoting oneself to applied research would distract the discipline from basic research on scholarly problems — thus creating this false binary between to whom knowledge is created for, whether it was for the perpetuation of the discipline or for application.

Furthermore, with the help of scholars like Paul Lazarsfeld, there was a method through which money could be acquired for research in a sustainable manner.

Lewin k 1947 frontiers in group dynamics human relations 1 1 5

He was confused by the concept of how while an individual distanced themselves from performing the Jewish identity in terms of religious expression and performance, they were still considered Jewish in the eyes of Nazis.

Rather than noting social justice as the beginning or the end, it was ingrained in every single academic action that Lewin took. It was this particular world view and paradigm that furthered his research and determined precisely how he was going to utilize the findings from his field research. Furthermore, it all reflected upon Lewin the man and his way of coping with the events of his time period. This devotion to action research was possibly a way of resolving a dissonance of his own passage to America and how he left his own back in present-day Poland.

Prominent psychologists mentored by Kurt Lewin included Leon Festinger 1919—1989who became known for his cognitive dissonance theory 1956environmental psychologist Roger BarkerBluma Zeigarnikand Morton Deutschthe founder of modern conflict resolution theory and practice. Force field analysis Force field analysis provides a framework for looking at the factors forces that influence a situation, originally social situations. It looks at forces that are either driving movement toward a goal helping forces or blocking movement toward a goal hindering forces.

The principle, developed by Kurt Lewin, is a significant contribution to the fields of social sciencepsychologysocial psychologyorganizational developmentprocess managementand change management. French who related it to organizational and industrial settings. Leadership climates Lewin often characterized organizational management styles and cultures in terms of leadership climates defined by [14] 1 authoritarian2 democratic and 3 laissez-faire work environments.

He is often mixed up with Lewin k 1947 frontiers in group dynamics human relations 1 1 5 with his work environments, but McGregor adapted them directly to leadership-theory. Authoritarian environments are characterized where the leader determines policy with techniques and steps for work tasks dictated by the leader in the division of labor.

The leader is not necessarily hostile but is aloof from participation in work and commonly offers personal praise and criticism for the work done. Democratic climates are characterized where policy is determined through collective processes with decisions assisted by the leader.

Before accomplishing tasks, perspectives are gained from group discussion and technical advice from a leader. Members are given choices and collectively decide the division of labor. Praise and criticism in such an environment are objectivefact minded and given by a group member without necessarily having participated extensively in the actual work.

Laissez-faire environments give freedom to the group for policy determination without any participation from the leader. The leader remains uninvolved in work decisions unless asked, does not participate in the division of labor, and very infrequently gives praise. It involved overcoming inertia and dismantling the existing "mind set".

  • In 1929, Lewin married Gertrud Weiss;
  • He was confused by the concept of how while an individual distanced themselves from performing the Jewish identity in terms of religious expression and performance, they were still considered Jewish in the eyes of Nazis;
  • He also joined the Psychological Institute of the University of Berlin where he lectured and gave seminars on both philosophy and psychology;
  • Carl Rogers believed that sensitivity training is "perhaps the most significant social invention of this century.

It must be part of surviving. Defense mechanisms have to be bypassed. In the second stage the change occurs. This is typically a period of confusion and transition. We are aware that the old ways are being challenged but we do not have a clear picture as to what we are replacing them with yet.

The third and final stage he called "freezing". The new mindset is crystallizing and one's comfort level is returning to previous levels. This is often misquoted as "refreezing" see Lewin,1947. It states that behavior is a function of the person in their environment. When first presented in Lewin's book Principles of Topological Psychology, published in 1936, it contradicted most popular theories in that it gave importance to a person's momentary situation in understanding his or her behavior, rather than relying entirely on the past.

He described this notion as the way that groups and individuals act and react to changing circumstances. This field emerged as a concept dedicated to the advancement of knowledge regarding the nature of groups, their laws, establishment, development, and interactions with other groups, individuals and institutions.

  • Given his background in Gestalt Psychology , Lewin justified group existence using the dictum "The whole is greater than the sum of its parts";
  • It had been said by skeptics that the actions of groups were nothing more than those of its members considered separately;
  • The leader is not necessarily hostile but is aloof from participation in work and commonly offers personal praise and criticism for the work done;
  • Human relations 1947 1;
  • Before accomplishing tasks, perspectives are gained from group discussion and technical advice from a leader;
  • Defense mechanisms have to be bypassed.

During the early years of research on group processes, many psychologists rejected the reality of group phenomena. Critics shared the opinion that groups did not exist as scientifically valid entities. It had been said by skeptics that the actions of groups were nothing more than those of its members considered separately.

Given his background in Gestalt PsychologyLewin justified group existence using the dictum "The whole is greater than the sum of its parts". He theorized that when a group is established it becomes a unified system with supervening qualities that cannot be understood by evaluating members individually. This notion - that a group is composed of more than the sum of its individual members - quickly gained support from sociologists and psychologists who understood the significance of this emerging field.

Many pioneers noted that the majority of group phenomena could be explained according to Lewin's equation and insight and opposing views were hushed. The study of group dynamics remains relevant in today's society where a vast number of professions e. In addition to group discussions, he became increasingly interested in group membership. He was curious as to how perspectives of an individual in relation to the group were solidified or weakened. He even tried to come up with the way identity was constructed from standpoint and perspectives.

Lewin started to become quite interested in how ideas were created and then perpetuated by the mentality of a group. Not included in this chapter is how important this became in looking at group dynamics across disciplines — including studying John F Kennedy and the way he tried to interact with his advisors in order to prevent groupthink from occurring.