Essays academic service


What would happen if the criteria for taking a case were more less stringent

Explanation[ edit ] Societies have investigated and punished acts of murder very differently over the development of criminal law. The Laws of Solonin early Athenian law, stated that if an accused pleaded that he was justified in killing another, his case would be tried in a dedicated court called the Delphinion where, for example, it was considered justifiable homicide to kill an adulterer or burglar caught in the act.

In 18th century English lawit was considered a justifiable homicide if a husband killed a man ravishing his wife Blackstone, Wm.

Lesson 1: Introduction to Epidemiology

The legal term In flagrante delicto Latin: On the one hand, states usually allow citizens to protect themselves from harm.

In modern times, this reflects a social contract where allegiance is rewarded by the provision of policing and other civil defense systems, and the apparatus of redress is a court system. In the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human RightsArticle 3 states that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person, and many nations' policy allows for some degree of leniency for self-defense. In most cases where self-defense is substantiated through the legal system, reduced charges i.

There is no clear legal standard for a homicide to be considered justifiable. The circumstances under which it is justified are usually considered to be that the defendant had no alternative method of self-defense or defense of another than to kill the attacker. Where a state is engaged in a war with a legitimate casus bellia combatant may lawfully kill an enemy combatant so long as that combatant is not hors de combat.

This principle is embedded in public international law and has been respected by most states around the world. Thus, if there is no formal declaration of war or the casus belli is not legitimate, all those who engage in the fighting and kill enemy combatants could theoretically be prosecuted.

Protecting the national interest against external aggressors is considered an excuse on utilitarian grounds, i.

Chapter 4. Measurement error and bias

Most countries agree that it is lawful for a citizen to repel violence with violence to protect his or her own or another's life and limb, or to prevent sexual assault or to quell a riot see below.

This is often considered a part of the defense of provocation against a charge of murder.

  1. Thanks to a statistical quirk this group then seems to improve because its members include some whose mean value is normal but who by chance had higher values at first examination. Bilateral conjunctival injection Oral changes erythema of lips or oropharynx, strawberry tongue, or fissuring of the lips Peripheral extremity changes edema, erythema, or generalized or periungual desquamation Rash Cervical lymphadenopathy at least one lymph node greater than or equal to 1.
  2. In a study to compare rates in different populations the absolute rates are less important, the primary concern being to avoid systematic bias in the comparisons. Assessment of repeatability may be built into a study - a sample of people undergoing a second examination or a sample of radiographs, blood samples, and so on being tested in duplicate.
  3. A case might be classified as suspected or probable while waiting for the laboratory results to become available.

Based on the idea that all individuals may suddenly and unexpectedly lose control when words are spoken or events occur, jurisdictions differ on whether this should be allowed to excuse liability or merely mitigate to a lesser offense such as manslaughterand under which circumstances this defense can be used. However, the law retains explicit exceptions which prohibit the prosecution "of any person for conduct relating to an abortion," "of any person for any medical treatment," or "of any woman with respect to her unborn child," thereby preserving the right to an abortion stemming from Roe v.

Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary: Provided that the arrestor is justified in terms of this section in using deadly force that is intended or is likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm to a suspect, only if he or she believes on reasonable grounds- a that the force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting the arrestor, any person lawfully assisting the arrestor or any other person from imminent or future death or grievous bodily harm; b that there is a substantial risk that the suspect will cause imminent or future death or grievous bodily harm if the arrest is delayed; or c that the offence for which the arrest is sought is in progress and is of a forcible and serious nature and involves the use of life threatening violence or a strong likelihood that it will cause grievous bodily harm.

Justifiable homicide

Examples in the United States[ edit ] A non-criminal homicide ruling, usually committed in self-defense or in defense of another, exists under United States law. A homicide may be considered justified if it is done to prevent a very serious crimesuch as rape, armed robberymanslaughter or murder.

The victim must reasonably believe, under the totality of the circumstancesthat the assailant intended to commit a serious crime.

  1. Heller , the majority held that the Constitution protected the right to the possession of firearms for the purpose of self-defense "and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home".
  2. Consistent findings do not necessarily imply that the technique is valid.
  3. It is much easier to test repeatability when material can be transported and stored - for example, deep frozen plasma samples, histological sections, and all kinds of tracings and photographs.

A homicide performed out of vengeance, or retribution for action in the past, would not be considered justifiable. In many states, given a case of self-defense, the defendant is expected to obey a duty to retreat if it is possible to do so.

Selection bias

Preemptive self-defense, in which one kills another on suspicion that the victim might eventually become dangerous, is considered criminal. Supreme Court ruling of District of Columbia v.

Hellerthe majority held that the Constitution protected the right to the possession of firearms for the purpose of self-defense "and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home". To quote the California State Penal Code state law that covers justifiable homicide: Homicide is justifiable when committed by public officers and those acting by their command in their aid and assistance, either-- 1.

In obedience to any judgment of a competent Court; or, 2. When necessarily committed in overcoming actual resistance to the execution of some legal process, or in the discharge of any other legal duty; or, 3. When necessarily committed in retaking felons who have been rescued or have escaped, or when necessarily committed in arresting persons charged with felony, and who are fleeing from justice or resisting such arrest.

Although the above text is from California law, most jurisdictions have similar laws to prevent escapees from custody.